← My Work

Housing.com | Jan 2026 – Jul 2026

An end-to-end audit of how a property photo travels from a broker's phone to a buyer's screen, and a strategy to build quality in from the first upload.

Read the story
Housing.com seller flow: the Add Photos screen with room coverage, uploaded images and upload tips
Role
Product Design Intern
Timeline
6 weeks
Worked with
Engineering, Data Quality, Product, Design
Scope
Research, systems audit, strategy, PRD, UI
← My Work

Housing.com | Jan 2026 – Jul 2026

An end-to-end audit of how a property photo travels from a broker's phone to a buyer's screen, and a strategy to build quality in from the first upload.

Role
Product Design Intern
Timeline
6 weeks
Worked with
Engineering, Data Quality, Product, Design
Scope
Research, systems audit, strategy, PRD, UI
Housing.com seller flow: the Add Photos screen with room coverage, uploaded images and upload tips

Every listing on Housing.com starts with photos that a broker or owner takes on their phone. Before a buyer sees them, they pass through four systems: upload, verification, optimisation and rendering, each looked after by a different team. This project follows that whole journey, not any single screen.

The short version

01 · The gap

In real estate, the photo is the first site visit.

Before a buyer requests a call, they scroll. A listing gets a few seconds of attention, and the photos do most of the talking in that time. Many Housing.com listings were losing that moment.

A bathroom photo that is far too dark to make out the room
/Too dark to read the room
A bedroom photo that looks soft and blurred after compression
/Blurred after compression
A balcony photo cropped so that part of the room is cut out
/Cropped out completely
Housing.com property detail page (PDP): the photo gallery with the cover image and a 'more' tile, marked 1
PDPProperty detail page
Housing.com search results page (SRP): a list of property cards with differently cropped photos, marked 2
SRPSearch results page
#1

Photos rank as the most useful feature in property search, ahead of price, location and description.

NAR, 2024
20x

Listings with fewer than 9 photos get 20× fewer enquiries. Image isn't presentation. It's conversion.

Zillow
11.9M

Listings on Housing.com: the multiplier on every ungoverned decision behind the pipeline.

Internal data, Feb 2026

02 · The answer

Build quality in, starting at the first upload.

Stop bad photos at the source, protect good ones on their way through and show every photo the way it deserves to be seen: Prevent, Preserve, Present.

Prevent

The guided upload

Instead of finding out after review, brokers now get guidance right beside the upload box and feedback the moment a photo lands. A dark photo is flagged on the spot, along with how to fix it.

  • Step 1 Room coverage, clear limits, instant feedback, do/avoid panel, missing room nudge.
  • Step 2 The checklist, the quality meter, the live listing-card preview.
Before
Before: the old Add Photos screen on the seller dashboard, where uploaded photos are all marked Others, with no guidance beside the upload box
After
After: the guided upload screen, with room coverage, a do and avoid panel, an instant 'image too dark' flag and a missing-rooms nudge
After: the review screen, with the gallery checklist, the image quality meter and a live listing-card preview

Preserve

The variant rules

A clear rule for which variant serves which slot, so compression stops softening photos that started out sharp.

Recommended for a later phase

Present

The rendering rulebook

I wrote the rules for how every listing photo is framed: three standard ratios, crop rules that protect what buyers look for, and a cover photo that stays put from search results to the property page.

1Three ratios. No ad-hoc exceptions.

The rendering rules, part 1: the three canonical ratios (4:3, 16:9, 3:4) and a table of which module uses which ratio

2Never crop the roofline. Keep the floor and ceiling in frame.

The rendering rules, part 2: crop rules, with safe areas and right and wrong crops for exteriors (never crop the roofline) and interiors (keep floor and ceiling)

3Three ratios. No ad-hoc exceptions.

The rendering rules, part 3: thumb continuity, where the primary image stays the same from the search results page to the property page

03 · How I got there

It wasn't a photo problem. It was a pipeline problem.

Picture a broker in an empty flat, carefully clicking every room. Before those photos reach a buyer, four different systems check, compress, resize and crop them, and any one of them can quietly undo that effort. So I stopped judging photos and followed one all the way through.

Process map: a broker uploads a listing, then either uploads already-clicked photos or opts in for self verification and clicks live photos (1). The image is processed and uploaded to the database (2), verification runs for approval, rejection and tags, optimisation happens on the fly (3), and the image is rendered across listings (4).
  1. UploadOwner / broker, Design
  2. VerificationDQ team
  3. OptimisationEngineering
  4. RenderingProduct / Design

4 stages, 4 user groups. No single owner of the end-to-end experience.

Following one image through four stages

01 · Upload

5 upload entry points

Five ways in, five different sets of rules.

One flow locked orientation and room order. Another had no rules at all.

02 · Verification

~5 min per listing

A strong audit, running too late.

03 · Optimisation

~15 compression variants

Variants, but no rules.

A sharp original could reach buyers as a blurry thumbnail.

04 · Rendering

~39 web · ~32 mobile ratios

39 ratios for one photo?

Up to five on the home page alone. The same photo looked different everywhere.

The insight

Quality was checked at the end, not built in at the start.

Each stage worked on its own. But because nothing guided a photo at upload, every stage after it was cleaning up. The audit rejected, reviewers checked by hand, and rendering cropped whatever arrived. The fix wasn't a stricter filter at the end. It was moving quality to the beginning.

04 · What I expect

What I expect this to change.

Hypotheses, not measured results. Each one names the signal I'd watch.

  1. Prevent

    Guided upload flow

    Picked up first

    I expectFewer poor photos reach review.

    Guidance beside the upload box and instant flags mean brokers fix a bad photo while still in the room.

    • Signal
    • Rejection rate at audit
    • Review time per listing
  2. Present

    Standardised rendering ratios

    Picked up first

    I expectEvery photo looks the same everywhere, so more buyers enquire.

    Three ratios and crop rules that protect the roofline, floor and ceiling, with a cover photo that stays put.

    • Signal
    • Enquiries per listing
  3. Preserve

    Variant rules

    Later phase

    I expectSharp originals stay sharp for buyers.

    One rule for which variant serves which slot, so compression stops softening good photos.

    • Signal
    • Share of listings with blurred photos

Up next

Snapp: An Immersive News Companion